Some months before I retired and
almost a year before I reached Full Retirement Age (FRA), I wrote a blog post
about the acronyms for retirement jargon, including FRA. It turns out that post-FRA
there are new acronyms I need to deal with.
Last week I had my mid-year
checkup. I was feeling pretty good about it. I’d lost 28 pounds from my visit
six months earlier and my blood pressure (BP) was down to 120 over 80. It had crept
up to the 140 over 90 range before I lost the weight. Then I noticed the column on
the report of my visit headed “Conditions” and saw that I’m still overweight.
Well (thought I), at least it doesn’t say “obese.”
My goal had been to lose another 10
pounds, maybe 15. I decided to go on-line to find out where I need to be so
that I’m no longer overweight. I’ve reached the age where I’ve been shrinking a
bit each year, and I was prepared for my target weight to shrink along with my
height. Shrink, yes, but wither to something not realistically attainable, no.
There are tons of websites that claim to help you calculate your ideal body
weight.
You have healthstatus.com and healthcentral.com.
There’s healthdiscovery.net and healthchecksystems.com. Also the basic calculator.net and the ever-popular webmd.com. Some of the sites require you
to input your body frame (small-boned, average, large-boned). To do this
accurately, you’re supposed to use calipers and measure your elbow thickness,
or else try to wrap your fingers around your wrist. I took the easy way out and
went with average frame.
On that basis, some of the sites
still label me obese. They all claim that I need to lose at least 25 additional
pounds to reach normal weight for my current height. What’s worse, one site
actually had the temerity to tell me that I can consume just 896 calories a day
if I want to lose weight. As if. I lost the 28 pounds eating 1100-1200. Did I say "eating?" I meant "starving."
The culprit in these
calculations is the BMI (Body Mass Index). That acronym was not
unfamiliar to me, but I had paid it little mind, and I certainly didn’t know
how to calculate it. For those who care: divide your body weight in pounds by
your height in inches squared. Then multiply that times 703. A normal BMI is 19 to 24.9, give or take a pinch, depending on the website.
I used to joke that no husband
should be allowed to weigh less than his wife. My husband is extremely thin, so
despite my extra baggage, I always felt he was partly to blame for the
disconnect in our poundage. Now I see that it’s all my fault. When I reach my proper
weight—notice I say when, not if—I will finally weigh less than he does.
By the end of the week, the
euphoria of my official weight loss and improved BP had morphed into the
depressing realization that it could be six more months before I can resume
visiting my wine rack once a week. You would think I would have left well
enough alone and settled in with a good book. You would be wrong. I returned to
the Internet to do research on yet another post-FRA acronym: RMD.
I will turn 69 next year and that
has put RMD (Required Minimum Distribution) on my radar. It’s
the amount one must withdraw from ones IRA after age 70½. Well, not exactly.
According to a variety of websites (including Uncle Sam’s), you have to start
withdrawing the money by April 1 of the calendar year after the year in which you turn 70½ (not 70). I determined that to be April 1,
2017 for me. How much one has to withdraw turns out to be not so straight-forward either.
The government’s Uniform Lifetime
Table (ULT) calculates your Life Expectancy Factor (LEF). It plugs that into a chart
to show the percentage of your IRA you have to withdraw. Each year longer that
you live, your projected longevity gets extended, so the percentage changes
every year. In other words, you can’t just sit down when you hit 70½ and figure
out how much to take out for each of the next five years, calculate the taxes
you’ll owe and determine how much you’ll have left to buy really fine wine.
If I had not known how high my BMI
is, the RMD based on the LEF in the ULT would have driven me straight into the arms of a
Montepulciano d’Abruzzo to lower my
BP. Instead I find myself in front of an open refrigerator, communing with a
jar of baby dill pickles (5 calories each). It’s a cruel world.
No comments:
Post a Comment